Jin & Kim, PLC | Legal Blog

Jin & Kim, PLC is an international law firm based in Busan, South Korea, providing bilingual legal services in Korean and English for foreign companies and individuals.

This blog offers practical guidance on Korean law and cross-border matters, helping foreign clients navigate legal procedures and real-world issues.

If you are looking for an English-speaking lawyer in Busan or legal assistance in Korea, you may submit your inquiry through the Contact page of this blog.

Initial responses are FREE OF CHARGE for inquiries submitted through the Contact page.

Civil/Legal Q&A

How Do You Recover Unpaid Invoices from a Korean Company?

Jin & Kim, PLC 2026. 5. 6. 15:54

Short Answer

Yes. Foreign companies may generally pursue recovery of unpaid invoices and other monetary claims against Korean companies through Korean court procedures.

In practice, recovery in Korea often involves three separate stages:

  1. Securing an enforceable title through procedures such as a payment order or civil lawsuit
  2. Preserving assets through provisional attachment (가압류)
  3. Enforcing against identifiable assets through compulsory execution procedures

Importantly, obtaining a judgment alone does not automatically result in payment. In many cases, the key issue is whether the creditor can identify and secure the debtor’s assets in Korea.


Can a Foreign Company Sue a Korean Company in Korea?

Generally, yes.

Foreign companies may file claims against Korean companies before Korean courts, and Korean procedural law recognizes litigation involving foreign corporate parties.

In practice, Korean courts commonly handle disputes involving:

  • International sales transactions
  • Shipping and logistics disputes
  • Manufacturing and supply agreements
  • Service agreements
  • Cross-border unpaid invoice claims

Jurisdiction issues may also depend on:

  • Contractual jurisdiction clauses
  • Governing law provisions
  • Asset location
  • Place of performance

Where an international contract contains an exclusive jurisdiction clause or arbitration agreement, Korean courts may examine those provisions under Korean private international law principles.


Is a Demand Letter Required Before Filing a Lawsuit?

Not necessarily.

Under Korean law, creditors can generally initiate court proceedings without first sending a formal demand letter.

However, in practice, a properly drafted demand letter may still be strategically useful because it can:

  • Clarify the amount claimed
  • Specify a payment deadline
  • Create documentary evidence of notice
  • Encourage settlement discussions
  • Increase pressure for voluntary payment

In some cross-border disputes, a law firm demand letter may also affect how seriously the debtor treats the matter.


What Is a Payment Order in Korea?

A payment order (지급명령) is a relatively streamlined court procedure commonly used for monetary claims.

In general:

  • The creditor files documentary evidence with the court
  • The court reviews the submission without a full hearing
  • If procedural requirements are satisfied, the court issues a payment order

If the debtor does not timely object after service, the payment order may become enforceable.

However:

  • If the debtor files a proper objection within the statutory period, the payment order loses its effect to that extent
  • The matter then proceeds as ordinary civil litigation

In international disputes, additional procedural complications may arise if overseas service or public notice service becomes necessary.


Can You Freeze Assets Before Winning the Case?

Potentially, yes.

Under Korean law, creditors may seek provisional attachment before obtaining a final judgment.

The purpose of provisional attachment is generally to preserve assets for future enforcement of monetary claims.

Depending on the circumstances, provisional attachment may target:

  • Bank accounts
  • Accounts receivable
  • Real estate
  • Inventory
  • Other identifiable assets

Importantly, in practice, provisional attachment is often one of the most important stages of debt recovery because it may prevent dissipation of assets before judgment enforcement becomes possible.


What Happens After You Obtain a Judgment?

A judgment or finalized payment order does not automatically produce payment.

Separate enforcement proceedings are generally required.

Depending on the situation, enforcement may involve:

  • Bank account garnishment
  • Seizure of receivables
  • Collection orders
  • Assignment orders
  • Real estate enforcement
  • Judicial auction procedures

As a practical matter, successful recovery often depends less on the judgment itself and more on whether enforceable assets can actually be identified.


Why Is Asset Identification So Important?

Korean enforcement procedures are fundamentally asset-based.

Even where a creditor clearly wins the case, recovery may become difficult if:

  • The debtor lacks identifiable assets
  • Operations have effectively ceased
  • Assets have already been transferred
  • Other creditors are competing for recovery
  • Overseas enforcement complications arise

For this reason, creditors often investigate issues such as:

  • Korean bank accounts
  • Commercial receivables
  • Business relationships
  • Real property ownership
  • Ongoing operations in Korea

At an early stage of the dispute.


What If the Korean Company Stops Operating?

This is a common practical issue in Korea.

Even where the legal claim itself is strong, actual recovery may become difficult if the company:

  • Has ceased meaningful operations
  • Holds few recoverable assets
  • Faces insolvency or bankruptcy
  • Has multiple competing creditors

Accordingly, timing and enforcement strategy are often critically important.


Practical Considerations for Foreign Companies

If you are attempting to recover unpaid invoices from a Korean company:

  • Preserve invoices, contracts, purchase orders, and delivery records
  • Organize emails and communications showing acknowledgment of the debt
  • Assess whether identifiable assets exist in Korea
  • Consider provisional attachment early
  • Understand that obtaining judgment and obtaining payment are separate issues

In cities such as Busan, where shipping, logistics, manufacturing, and international trade disputes frequently arise, cross-border debt recovery matters are common in practice.


Conclusion

Foreign companies may generally pursue unpaid invoice claims against Korean companies through Korean legal procedures, including payment orders, civil litigation, provisional attachment, and compulsory enforcement.

However, debt recovery in Korea is ultimately an enforcement-driven process. In many cases, the practical outcome depends not only on the legal validity of the claim, but also on whether the creditor can identify, preserve, and enforce against the debtor’s assets in Korea.